40nm BSI CMOS Image SensorPreview

CIS Backside Wafer Edge-Grind

294/ 417

ultrasonic clean

CIS Backside Si, CMP1
292CIS Backside Wafer Surface Grind293CIS Backside Wafer Edge-Grind294ultrasonic clean295CIS Backside Si, CMP1296CIS Backside Si, CMP2 (target thickness adjust)297ultrasonic cleaning

Process Cross-Section

ISP WaferCIS Wafer · BacksideClean only · geometry unchangedTHIN · T3 · Ultrasonic CleanSiCESLSiO2CuTaAlSiN

Step highlight

Ultrasonic cleaning achieves high particle removal efficiency without applying macroscopic mechanical pressure to the silicon substrate, thus safeguarding the structural integrity of the wafer .

In depth

The ultrasonic clean step is strategically positioned immediately following the CIS Backside Wafer Edg

e-Grind and prior to the Backside Si CMP steps . The edge-grinding process relies on mechanical abrasion to contour the wafer perimeter, which inherently generates significant quantities of silicon dust and abrasive particulate residue . If these submicron particles are not rigorously removed, they will act as parasitic abrasives during the subsequent CMP operations, leading to catastrophic micro-scratching and defect generation on the thinned silicon surface . Therefore, this cleaning step serves as a critical particulate decontamination barrier, ensuring a pristine backside surface to maintain the stability and defect-free requirements of the downstream planarization processes . The core physical mechanism of this step relies on the transmission of high-frequency acoustic waves through a liquid medium to remove adhered contaminants . Particles adhere to the wafer surface primarily through short-range van der Waals attraction and initial hydrogen bonding, which determine the baseline adhesion strength . The ultrasonic or megasonic waves generate alternating high and low pressure cycles in the fluid, resulting in the formation and violent collapse of cavitation bubbles . The implosion of these bubbles creates localized high-velocity micro-jets and intense acoustic streaming that exert extreme hydrodynamic shear forces on the wafer surface . When this applied hydrodynamic force exceeds the combined van der Waals and electrostatic adhesion forces, the particles are successfully dislodged from the substrate . To prevent re-deposition, the pH of the cleaning fluid is often tuned to modify the zeta potential of both the wafer surface and the dislodged particles, enforcing an electrostatic repulsion between them . A non-contact acoustic cleaning method is explicitly selected over contact-based scrubbing due to the fragile nature of the extensively thinned, bonded wafer pair . While full-contact brush cleaning can overcome high adhesion forces via direct normal and tangential mechanical stress, it poses a severe risk of mechanical damage to the delicately ground wafer edge . Ultrasonic cleaning achieves high particle removal efficiency without applying macroscopic mechanical pressure to the silicon substrate, thus safeguarding the structural integrity of the wafer . Furthermore, specialized equipment designs can utilize localized acoustic cleaning, where only the wafer backside contacts a surface-tension-elevated liquid meniscus, thereby avoiding full wafer immersion and further reducing mechanical stress on the bonded interface . For a 40nm BSI CMOS Image Sensor, the requirement for absolute surface integrity is extremely stringent because the backside silicon directly interfaces with incoming photons (Engineering Practice). Any residual submicron particles that cause nanoscale scratching during the subsequent CMP steps can introduce localized energy states within the silicon bandgap . These defect states act as carrier generation-recombination centers, which fundamentally degrade device performance by increasing dark current and white pixel defects . Consequently, optimizing the ultrasonic cleaning efficiency is essential for preserving the optoelectronic fidelity of the 40nm CIS architecture .

Risks & Challenges

  • [High] Surface Pitting and Roughening: Excessive acoustic power or non-uniform transducer distribution leads to overly aggressive cavitation bubble collapse directly on the silicon substrate (Engineering Practice). This intense localized energy can physically erode the silicon, inducing microscopic surface roughness and pitting that degrades the starting condition for the subsequent CMP step .
  • [High] Particle Re-deposition: If the chemical composition of the cleaning fluid fails to establish a mutually repulsive zeta potential between the dislodged particles and the wafer, particles will be drawn back to the surface . This occurs because short-range van der Waals attraction and electrostatic forces dominate at the nanoscale, causing suspended particles to re-adhere and contaminate the cleaned wafer .
  • [Medium] Adhesion-Induced Defect Persistence: If the queue time between the edge-grind and the ultrasonic clean is excessively long, silicon particles exposed to moisture will undergo interfacial chemical reactions and aging effects . This aging process induces adhesion-driven deformation that drastically increases the real contact area, rendering the physical forces of acoustic cavitation insufficient to detach the particles .
  • [Low] Edge Micro-crack Propagation: Although ultrasonic cleaning is a non-contact method, the hydrodynamic shear and acoustic streaming generated near the wafer edge can still concentrate stress . If the preceding edge-grind step left unmitigated micro-cracks, the turbulent fluid dynamics could force fluid into these fissures, propagating the cracks and risking localized delamination of the bonded pair .

Sign in to continue through all 417 steps

Sign up with emailLog in

Related steps

  • CIS Backside Wafer Surface Grind
  • CIS Backside Wafer Edge-Grind
  • CIS Backside Si, CMP1
  • CIS Backside Si, CMP2 (target thickness adjust)
  • ultrasonic cleaning