14nm FinFETPreview

FCT CSOH Oxide Deposition

29/ 362

Fin Pad Oxide Etch

STI3 SiN Hard Mask Deposition
29Fin Pad Oxide Etch
+23 steps

Process Cross-Section

Gate Cut (sense W)Fin Cut (sense L)STI · ST01 · Fin Pad OX EtchSiNSiSiNSi

Step highlight

The etch rate is governed by surface coverage kinetics, meaning that changes in radical flux, ion energy, or surface temperature directly modify the balance between chemical reaction and physical sputtering .

In depth

Device Context and Integration Rationale

The Fin Pad Oxide Etch is positioned after fin hard mask removal and resist ash to selectively remove the pad oxide that caps the fin top and sidewall base, thereby re‑exposing crystalline silicon for the subsequent fin silicon etch that defi

nes fin height and isolation depth . This step exists at this precise location because earlier hard‑mask etches and ash steps inevitably leave an oxide interface between the silicon fin and the surrounding STI oxide, which would otherwise act as an unintended etch stop or modify the silicon etch kinetics in the following Fin Si Etch . From a device‑physics perspective, exposing a clean and continuous silicon surface at the fin top is critical because the fin sidewalls later form the transistor channel, where interface quality directly impacts surface mobility and threshold voltage variability . By preparing a controlled silicon/oxide boundary before fin silicon etching, this step enables the subsequent Fin Si Etch to define a fin profile that is electrically uniform across dense fin arrays, which is a prerequisite for predictable short‑channel behavior in FinFETs .

Physical and Chemical Mechanism

The Fin Pad Oxide Etch relies on plasma‑assisted chemical etching of silicon dioxide, where reactive radicals form volatile reaction products with oxide constituents while directional ion bombardment assists in breaking surface bonds and controlling etch anisotropy . In this mechanism, neutral fluorine‑based radicals adsorb on the oxide surface and react to form volatile silicon‑fluoride species, while ion energy from the plasma sheath enhances reaction probability and removes reaction by‑products from horizontal and partially shadowed surfaces . The etch rate is governed by surface coverage kinetics, meaning that changes in radical flux, ion energy, or surface temperature directly modify the balance between chemical reaction and physical sputtering . This balance is particularly important at the fin base, where three‑dimensional topography alters local electric fields and species transport, making the process sensitive to microloading and aspect‑ratio‑dependent effects, as observed in advanced FinFET structures .

Material and Method Selection Logic

A dry plasma oxide etch is selected over wet chemistry because anisotropy and local selectivity are required to avoid excessive oxide loss along fin sidewalls and STI corners, which would otherwise translate into fin‑height nonuniformity after the silicon etch . Silicon dioxide is removed in preference to silicon because the chemical reaction pathways for oxide etching are distinct and can be tuned to suppress direct silicon consumption, thereby protecting the fin body prior to the silicon etch step . Process parameter interactions follow clear physical directions: increasing ion energy enhances directionality but also raises the risk of silicon surface damage, while increasing radical density improves chemical efficiency but can degrade selectivity if not balanced by ion‑assisted desorption . The method choice therefore reflects a compromise between etch completeness, silicon preservation, and surface roughness control, all of which are known to influence interface trap density and carrier mobility in MOSFET channels .

Node‑Specific Considerations for 14 nm FinFETs

At the 14 nm node, fin pitch and width are sufficiently small that even minor variations in oxide recess translate into measurable variations in fin height and effective channel width, amplifying device variability across a die . The three‑dimensional fin geometry increases the relative contribution of surface scattering to carrier transport, making the preservation of a low‑damage silicon surface during oxide removal more critical than in planar technologies . Compared with other oxide etch steps in the flow, such as thick gate oxide or S/D pad oxide etches, the Fin Pad Oxide Etch uniquely interfaces with the future channel region, so its success is judged not only by etch completeness but also by the electrical quality of the exposed silicon surface . This step therefore embodies the shift in advanced nodes from purely dimensional control toward simultaneous structural and electrical optimization, consistent with the integration challenges highlighted for FinFET technologies .

Risks & Challenges

  • [High] Silicon Surface Damage: Excessive ion energy during oxide removal can amorphize or roughen the exposed silicon fin surface, increasing interface trap density and degrading carrier surface mobility in later gate formation steps, following the damage mechanisms described for plasma etching of silicon surfaces .
  • [High] Oxide Under‑Etch at Fin Base: Incomplete removal of pad oxide in recessed fin regions can act as a local etch stop during the subsequent Fin Si Etch, leading to nonuniform fin height and degraded electrostatic control across the fin array .
  • [Medium] STI Corner Loss: Over‑etch or poor selectivity can remove STI oxide near fin corners, weakening fin mechanical support and altering isolation geometry, which can exacerbate leakage paths and layout‑dependent effects in dense FinFET structures .
  • [Medium] Microloading‑Induced Nonuniformity: Pattern density variations modify local radical consumption and ion flux, causing spatial etch‑rate differences that translate into fin‑height variability, consistent with plasma transport and surface kinetics effects described in advanced plasma etching studies .
  • [Low] Post‑Etch Residue Formation: Incomplete desorption of reaction by‑products can leave fluorinated or polymeric residues on silicon surfaces, which may interfere with subsequent silicon etch chemistry or oxidation steps if not adequately cleaned .

A free account opens the full rationale, risk analysis, and the paper and patent citations behind them.

Sign Up Free

Or

Need every step? Pay once for lifetime access.

Pay by card, PayPal, Apple Pay, or Google Pay — exact options shown at checkout · 14-day money-back guarantee